pub const fn forget<T>(t: T)Expand description
Takes ownership and “forgets” about the value without running its destructor.
Any resources the value manages, such as heap memory or a file handle, will linger forever in an unreachable state. However, it does not guarantee that pointers to this memory will remain valid.
- If you want to leak memory, see
Box::leak. - If you want to obtain a raw pointer to the memory, see
Box::into_raw. - If you want to dispose of a value properly, running its destructor, see
mem::drop.
§Safety
forget is not marked as unsafe, because Rust’s safety guarantees
do not include a guarantee that destructors will always run. For example,
a program can create a reference cycle using Rc, or call
process::exit to exit without running destructors. Thus, allowing
mem::forget from safe code does not fundamentally change Rust’s safety
guarantees.
That said, leaking resources such as memory or I/O objects is usually undesirable.
The need comes up in some specialized use cases for FFI or unsafe code, but even
then, ManuallyDrop is typically preferred.
Because forgetting a value is allowed, any unsafe code you write must
allow for this possibility. You cannot return a value and expect that the
caller will necessarily run the value’s destructor.
§Examples
The canonical safe use of mem::forget is to circumvent a value’s destructor
implemented by the Drop trait. For example, this will leak a File, i.e. reclaim
the space taken by the variable but never close the underlying system resource:
use std::mem;
use std::fs::File;
let file = File::open("foo.txt").unwrap();
mem::forget(file);This is useful when the ownership of the underlying resource was previously transferred to code outside of Rust, for example by transmitting the raw file descriptor to C code.
§Relationship with ManuallyDrop
While mem::forget can also be used to transfer memory ownership, doing so is error-prone.
ManuallyDrop should be used instead. Consider, for example, this code:
use std::mem;
let mut v = vec![65, 122];
// Build a `String` using the contents of `v`
let s = unsafe { String::from_raw_parts(v.as_mut_ptr(), v.len(), v.capacity()) };
// leak `v` because its memory is now managed by `s`
mem::forget(v); // ERROR - v is invalid and must not be passed to a function
assert_eq!(s, "Az");
// `s` is implicitly dropped and its memory deallocated.There are two issues with the above example:
- If more code were added between the construction of
Stringand the invocation ofmem::forget(), a panic within it would cause a double free because the same memory is handled by bothv